Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Following Injectable PI-Based Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

This nationwide, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), ixazomib plus lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone (DEX) (IRd) following injectable PI-based therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Of 45 patients enrolled, 36 patients received IRd after achieving at least a minor response to 3 cycles of bortezomib or carfilzomib plus LEN + DEX (VRd, n=6; KRd, n=30). At median follow-up of 20.8 months, the 12-month event-free survival rate (primary endpoint) was 49% (90% CI: 35.9-62.0), counting 11 events of progressive disease/death, 8 dropouts and 4 missing response data. The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by Kaplan-Meier analysis (dropouts as censoring) was 74% (95% CI: 56-86). Median PFS and time to next treatment (95% CI) were 29.0 (21.3-NE) and 32.3 (14.9-35.4) months, respectively; median OS was not evaluable. The overall response rate was 73%, and 42% of patients had a very good partial response or better. Frequent (≥10% incidence) grade ≥3 treatment emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil and platelet counts (n=7 [16%] each). Two deaths occurred (one during KRd treatment and one during IRd treatment), both due to pneumonia. IRd following injectable PI-based therapy was tolerable and efficacious in RRMM patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03416374; Date of registration: January 31, 2018.

Post-marketing surveillance of carfilzomib in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Aim: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of carfilzomib in a real-world setting. Methods: A post-marketing surveillance of Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received carfilzomib treatment was performed. Results: Overall incidences of adverse events of any grade, ≥grade 3 treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events were 63.5, 44.6 and 37.7% of patients, respectively. No new safety findings were observed. Treatment-related adverse events of special interest (≥5%) were hematological toxicities, infectious disease, cardiac disorders (including cardiac failure, myocardial infarction and QT prolongation), renal disorders, liver failure or liver dysfunction, and hypertension or hypertensive crisis. The overall response rate was 46.5%. Conclusion: Carfilzomib was found to be a safe and effective treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in Japanese patients.

Carfilzomib is a medicine that was recently approved for the treatment of cancer of bone marrow (multiple myeloma) that comes back or does not respond to previous treatment (relapsed or refractory). Data gathered from the hospitals, where the medicine is commonly used, was used to generate evidence. We looked at how well carfilzomib works in Japanese participants and if it is safe. Overall, 63.5% of participants treated with carfilzomib had side effects and 37.7% had serious side effects. Death occurred in 3.1% of participants during the study. Decrease in bone marrow and blood cells, infections, heart and kidney disorder, liver failure or dysfunction, and high blood pressure occurred in 5% or more participants. In 46.5% of participants the tumors had disappeared or shrank. In Japanese participants, carfilzomib was found to be safe and effective treatment for cancer of bone marrow that comes back or does not respond to previous treatment.

Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance.

Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance. Methods This was a nationwide non-interventional observational study conducted in Japan. The study included all patients who received ixazomib from May 24 to September 24, 2017. Ixazomib was administered to RRMM patients according to the Japanese package insert. All enrolled patients were observed until the completion of the sixth treatment cycle or until ixazomib discontinuation. The patient treatment course, including adverse events (AEs), was reported. Results The safety analysis set included 741 patients; the median age was 71 (range 35-92) years old, and the median number of prior treatment lines was 3 (range 1-30). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 572 (77.2%) patients, most commonly being thrombocytopenia (49.9%), diarrhea (29.2%), and nausea (12.4%). Serious ADRs occurred in 193 (26.0%) patients, most commonly being thrombocytopenia (9.9%) and diarrhea (5.9%). Thrombocytopenia, severe gastrointestinal disorders, infections, skin disorders, and peripheral neuropathy were prespecified as ADRs of clinical importance; the frequency of these ADRs (grade ≥3) were 28.5%, 9.4%, 7.4%, 2.2%, and 1.3%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation was most common with thrombocytopenia and severe gastrointestinal disorders (49 and 43 patients, respectively). Eleven patients died due to ADRs (16 events). Conclusion These results suggest that ixazomib has a tolerable safety profile in clinical practice in Japan. However, close AE management for thrombocytopenia and gastrointestinal disorders should be considered.

A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. The current study was conducted to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients. METHODS: This phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study enrolled patients aged ≥ 20 years with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma at 16 sites in Japan. Patients refractory to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor-based therapy at any line were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response or better in the response-evaluable analysis set. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival and safety. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients were enrolled. The rate of very good partial response or better was 50.0% (95% confidence interval 31.9-68.1) and the overall response rate was 84.4% (95% confidence interval 67.2-94.7). Median progression-free survival was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval 17.3-not evaluable) and median overall survival was not estimable. The safety profile of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in this study was similar to that in the TOURMALINE-MM1 study. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma are comparable with reported TOURMALINE-MM1 study results. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02917941; date of registration September 28, 2016.

Efficacy and safety of weekly carfilzomib (70 mg/m2), dexamethasone, and daratumumab (KdD70) is comparable to twice-weekly KdD56 while being a more convenient dosing option: a cross-study comparison of the CANDOR and EQUULEUS studies.

The regimen of carfilzomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (KdD) shows activity in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. KdD at the twice-weekly 56 mg/m2 carfilzomib dose (KdD56) was used in the randomized phase 3 CANDOR study (NCT03158688), whereas KdD at the once-weekly 70 mg/m2 carfilzomib dose (KdD70) was used in the phase 1 b EQUULEUS study (NCT01998971). We analyzed efficacy data from comparable CANDOR and EQUULEUS patients using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted models. These weights were calculated from propensity scores derived to balance prespecified baseline covariates. The side-by-side and adjusted comparisons showed similar efficacy for overall response rates and progression-free survival in the two groups, with a series of sensitivity analyses showing consistent findings. Safety data were generally consistent with the known safety profiles of each individual drug. Once-weekly KdD70 is comparable to twice-weekly KdD56 in terms of efficacy and safety while being a more convenient dosing option.

Phase I, multicenter, dose-escalation study of avadomide in adult Japanese patients with advanced malignancies.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy has limited efficacy in some patients, resulting in relapsed or refractory disease. Avadomide (CC-122) is a novel cereblon-binding agent that exhibits antilymphoma and immune-modulation activities with a biological profile distinct from similar agents, such as lenalidomide. This phase I multicenter study evaluated avadomide in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors or NHL. Fourteen patients with NHL and one with a solid tumor (esophageal carcinoma), were enrolled in four dose-escalation cohorts using a 3 + 3 design. Primary endpoints included safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum-tolerated dose and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D), and pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. One patient with NHL experienced DLT, which included face edema, pharyngeal edema, and tumor flare (all grade 1) that led to a dose reduction. Eleven patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events, most frequently decreased neutrophil count (33%) and decreased lymphocyte count (20%). The ORR in patients with NHL (n = 13) was 54%, including four complete and three partial responses. The best response for the solid tumor patient was progressive disease. Avadomide dose intensity was consistent across cohorts, and the 3-mg dose given five consecutive days/week was established as the RP2D. This phase I study identified a tolerable dose of avadomide, with an acceptable toxicity profile and clinically meaningful efficacy in Japanese patients with previously treated NHL.

Retraction Note to: High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a nationwide survey.

This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-020-03018-1.

The 31-nucleotide Y4-RNA fragment in plasma is a potential novel biomarker.

The 31- and 32-nt 5'-fragment of Y4-RNA (Y4RNAfr) exists abundantly in human peripheral blood plasma. Although physiological roles of the plasma Y4RNAfr are not well established, its potential utility as a diagnostic/prognostic marker for acute coronary syndrome was suggested. In this paper, to establish a normal range of the Y4RNAfr level in plasma, we measured plasma Y4RNAfr levels of 40 healthy persons using the method we have developed, and compared them with other blood test data. From the obtained data, we tentatively regarded <0.1 fmol/ng as normal for the Y4RNAfr level in peripheral blood plasma. And the white blood cell count (WBC) and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level showed moderate positive correlations with the Y4RNAfr level, suggesting that Y4RNAfr could be a potential novel inflammatory marker. We also measured the Y4RNAfr level in peripheral blood plasma from four multiple myeloma patients. The plasma Y4RNAfr level was abnormal in all four myeloma patients, and the levels for two patients were far beyond the normal level. The WBC for each patient was normal and the CRP levels for two patients were normal. These observations together suggest that a high level of Y4RNAfr in peripheral blood plasma and a normal WBC could be indicative of multiple myeloma.

Final results of a phase I study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma.

We report the final results from a multicenter, open-label phase I study of carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Twenty-six RRMM patients were enrolled and received a median of 4.0 prior regimens; 12/26 patients (46.2%) completed the planned 18 administration cycles (mean number of cycles: 14.5 ± 4.9). The safety profile was consistent with that of previous carfilzomib studies. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), but no new safety concerns were observed. The most common grade ≥ 3 AEs (incidence: ≥ 10%) were lymphocyte count decreased (46.2%), platelet count decreased (42.3%), and neutrophil count decreased (34.6%). The overall response rate was 88.5% (23/26; 90% confidence interval: 72.8-96.8). Complete response (CR) or better was achieved by 30.8% of patients compared with 3.8% in the interim analysis. The median time to CR or better response was 9.4 months. Median progression-free survival and duration of response were 19.5 months and 20.3 months, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached. Long-term administration of carfilzomib produced deep response and long-term disease control. The combination of carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone was well tolerated and showed promising clinical efficacy for heavily pretreated RRMM patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial was registered in the database clinicaltrials.jp (clinical trial registration number: Japic CTI 142677).

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in adults: 25 years of experience in Japan.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has not gained universal popularity in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and its status remains unclear. To determine the implementation status and outcomes of autologous HCT for adults with AML in Japan, we analyzed data from 1,174 patients (including 446 with acute promyelocytic leukemia [APL]) who underwent autologous HCT between 1992 and 2016 consecutively reported to the Japanese nationwide transplantation registry. The annual number of transplantations peaked at 82 cases in 1997, and has recently remained at around 40 cases. The percentage of APL has increased sharply since 2004, and currently exceeds 70%. While most non-APL patients underwent autologous HCT during first complete remission (CR), transplantation during second CR has become mainstream for APL patients since the early 2000s. The 5-year survival, relapse, and non-relapse mortality rates were 55.3%, 42.1%, and 8.6% for non-APL patients, and 87.6%, 12.9%, and 3.4% for APL patients, respectively. Patients transplanted in the later period showed better survival than those transplanted in the earlier period, both for non-APL (P < 0.001) and APL (P = 0.036). These results clearly show the various changes in transplantation practice and post-transplant outcomes in Japan over the past 25 years.

High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a nationwide survey.

To investigate the use of high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) between 1990 and 2007, we conducted a nationwide survey using the registry database of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Of the 1222 patients in the database, 576 (47%) received ASCT in first complete remission (CR1), 140 (12%) in first partial remission, 281 (23%) in sensitive relapse, 150 (12%) in resistant or sensitivity-unknown relapse, and 75 (6%) in primary refractory status. With a median follow-up of 22 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rates were 71% and 68%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 2-year non-relapse mortality and relapse/progression were 6% and 26%, respectively. Relapse/progression after ASCT in the rituximab era (2002-2007) was significantly lower than that in the pre-rituximab era (1990-2001; P < 0.001). Older age, male gender, poor performance status at ASCT, non-CR1 at ASCT, ASCT performed in 1990-2001, and LEED or MCEC regimen were adverse predictors of OS. Because ASCT for newly diagnosed high-risk DLBCL has not been performed recently, a registry database study to assess the impact of ASCT for relapsed or refractory DLBCL in the rituximab era is warranted.

Carfilzomib monotherapy in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A phase 1/2 study.

This multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 study evaluated single-agent carfilzomib in 50 heavily pretreated Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (median of five prior treatments). In phase 1, patients were dosed at three levels: 15, 20, or 20/27 mg/m2 . Maximum tolerated dosage was not reached at the tolerability evaluation. Patients in phase 2 were treated with 20/27 mg/m2 carfilzomib. Median duration of exposure to carfilzomib in the 20/27 mg/m2 group at this final analysis was 4.7 months (range: 0.3-39.4). Overall response rate in the 20/27 mg/m2 group, primary endpoint of the study, was 22.5% (n = 9) (95% confidence interval, 12.3-37.5) with 2.5% (n = 1) stringent complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival in the 20/27 mg/m2 group were 5.1 months (95% CI, 2.8-13.6) and 22.9 months (95% CI, 14.1-not estimable), respectively. Frequently occurring grade ≥3 adverse events in the 20/27 mg/m2 group included lymphopenia (72.5%), neutropenia (40.0%), and leukopenia (32.5%). Giving long-term carfilzomib monotherapy led to long-term overall survival for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients with a favorable safety profile. Carfilzomib monotherapy can be a good option for heavily pretreated multiple myeloma patients.

Evaluation of the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma.

In spite of recent development in the treatment armamentarium for multiple myeloma, overall survival (OS) still depends on risk status and sensitivity to treatment of each patient. We have evaluated the clinical relevance of the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) by comparing it with the original ISS in 718 Japanese patients. The distribution of patients according to response was similar between the ISS and R-ISS stages. Treatment response was greatly influenced by initial treatment modalities and deeper response was observed more frequently in transplanted patients. The R-ISS discriminated the difference in OS between the stages more distinctly than the ISS (p = 9.0 × 10-15 and p = 4.0 × 10-10, respectively). Differences in OS were clarified by both R-ISS and ISS in non-transplanted patients (p = 2.4 × 10-12 and p = 1.4 × 10-8, respectively), but the ISS failed to distinguish the difference between the stages in transplanted patients (p = 0.13). In contrast, the R-ISS could at least discriminate the excellent prognosis of stage I patients whereas the distinction between stage II and III was not that clear (p = 0.033). The R-ISS stage II encompassed a large number of patients, and the prognosis was heterogeneous depending on the fulfillment of prognostic factors such as LDH and adverse cytogenetics. These results suggest that treatment factors and prognostic factors greatly affect the therapeutic response and outcome, and the R-ISS is superior to ISS in prognostication of both transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients in our current clinical practice.

Correction to: Future projection of cancer patients with cardiovascular disease in Japan by the year 2039: a pilot study.

n the original publication, in a title of Table 2.

Future projection of cancer patients with cardiovascular disease in Japan by the year 2039: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The number of cancer patients in Japan is estimated to rise to 3.5 million by 2025. The disease burden may be further complicated by comorbidities caused by cardiovascular disease (CVD). Predicting the number of cancer patients with CVD can help anticipate future resource needs. METHODS: We used statistics derived from the Niigata Cancer Center CVD Study (2015) as well as population estimates from the National Cancer Center's Cancer Registry and Statistics survey of 2017 for convenience. We simply multiplied the projected number of cancer patients through the year 2039 by the CVD prevalence in 2015, with patients classified by sex, age, and cancer type to estimate the number of cancer patients with CVD. RESULTS: The total number of Japanese cancer patients with CVD was 253,000 in 2015 and is predicted to increase rapidly by 30,000 in 2020 and peak at 313,000 in 2030-2034. Men will dominate the CVD population at 2.5-fold the number of women. The growth rate of the population with both cancer and CVD will be greater than that of the cancer-only population (1.23 vs 1.18, P < 0.001), and will comprise notably high proportions of patients with prostatic, breast, and uterine cancers (1.80, 1.57, and 1.66, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Future cancer patients will be older and more likely to have CVD. Although men will continue to dominate this population, the increase in the number of women will be pronounced. Cancer care providers should be trained to recognize CVD and provide any necessary interventions concurrently with cancer therapy.

Risk factors and timing of autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT) is an option for patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL); however, neither prospective nor retrospective studies support proceeding with ASCT upfront, and the timing of HDC-ASCT remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for outcomes of 570 patients with PTCL, including PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), who received ASCT for frontline consolidation (n = 98 and 75, respectively) or alternative therapies after either relapse (n = 112 and 75) or primary induction failure (PIF; n = 127 and 83) between 2000 and 2015. Significant risk factors for overall survival (OS) after upfront ASCT were a ≥ 2 prognostic index for T-cell lymphoma (P < 0.001) and partial response (PR) at ASCT (P = 0.041) in PTCL-NOS patients, and > 60 years of age (P = 0.0028) and PR at ASCT (P = 0.0013) in AITL patients. Performance status of ≥ 2 at ASCT (P < 0.001), receiving ≥ 3 regimens before ASCT (P = 0.018), and PR at ASCT (P = 0.018) in PTCL-NOS patients and > 60 years of age at ASCT (P = 0.0077) in AITL patients were risk factors for OS after ASCT with a chemosensitive PIF status. Strategies that carefully select PTCL patients may allow identification of individuals suitable for ASCT.

A phase 3b, multicenter, open-label extension study of the long-term safety of anagrelide in Japanese adults with essential thrombocythemia.

Cytoreductive therapy is used in high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) to reduce risk of thrombohemorrhagic complications. Anagrelide is an orally active, quinazolone-derived platelet-lowering agent approved for first-line treatment of high-risk ET in Japan. Long-term safety and efficacy data were collected from 53 Japanese high-risk ET patients (Study 308); 41 patients who completed Study 308 entered this phase 3b, open-label extension (Study 309; NCT01467661). Reductions in mean platelet counts occurred throughout the study, from 1021.6 × 109/L (at Study 308 baseline) to 675.4 × 109/L at final assessment. At month 48 (since Study 308 enrollment), mean platelet count was 444.5 × 109/L in the 10 patients who completed 4 years of therapy. Overall, platelet counts decreased from 1088.3 × 109/L at Study 308 baseline (n = 33) to 473.5 × 109/L at final assessment (n = 31). Long-term platelet count reductions were maintained without marked changes in mean anagrelide dose. Anagrelide was generally well tolerated, with anemia (54.7%) and headache (49.1%) as the most frequent adverse events. These findings indicate that anagrelide effectively reduces platelet counts in high-risk Japanese ET patients, with titration resulting in a well-tolerated, effective and sustainable dose. In conclusion, these results support anagrelide administration to high-risk Japanese ET patients using individualized dosing strategies defined in instructions previously approved in Europe and the USA.